ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2026
Effectiveness and safety of water laser-assisted endodontic-periodontal therapy: A retrospective controlled study.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveCombined endodontic-periodontal lesions are challenging to manage because complete debridement is often difficult to achieve with conventional root canal therapy and scaling and root planing alone. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of adjunctive water laser therapy in improving pulp-periodontal outcomes.MethodsThis single-center retrospective controlled study included 634 teeth with 12 ± 3 months of follow-up, including 295 treated with adjunctive water laser treatment and 339 treated according to a conventional nonlaser regimen. Propensity score overlap weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics, with all standardized differences <0.10 after weighting. The primary endpoint was pulp-periodontal composite success. Secondary endpoints included changes in probing depth and clinical attachment level, bleeding on probing negativity, and acute exacerbation within 7 postoperative days. Safety was assessed using a Miettinen-Nurminen noninferiority test with a 5% risk-difference margin.ResultsThe water laser group showed a higher composite success rate than the control group (risk ratio = 1.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 1.36; risk difference = 13.88 percentage points, 95% confidence interval: 6.97 to 20.34;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.