ArticleMedical physics2026
An analytical framework for efficient and precision-controlled Monte Carlo simulation of heterogeneous targeted alpha therapy microdosimetry.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDosimetric studies of targeted alpha therapy (TAT) show that microscopic heterogeneity in geometry and source distribution strongly affects dose-effect relationships, underscoring the potential of microdosimetry. While Monte Carlo (MC) simulation is the gold standard for dose assessment, its application to TAT microdosimetry remains methodologically challenging and computationally inefficient. This necessitates a systematic and implementable methodology for microdosimetric simulation and analysis. PURPOSE: This study aimed to establish a quantitative MC simulation framework for TAT microdosimetry, in which heterogeneous conditions are analytically processed and Type A standard uncertainty of derived microdosimetric quantities can be estimated.
methods(1) Elementary-source events were defined under arbitrary microscopic conditions, and the raw moments of single-event microdosimetric quantities scored via MC simulation were identified for each event. The heterogeneous microdosimetric environments were modeled as weighted mixtures of elementary events. (2) Analytical error propagation was derived to explicitly quantify the standard error (SE) of mixture quantities. This enables, for the first time, a trace-back mechanism to identify error-dominating source components for optimized resource allocation. (3) A long-range radiation correction for
resultsA Geant4-based application implemented the framework in heterogeneous microscopic models. The validation against repeated direct sampling demonstrated consistency between the mixture framework and conventional repeated direct simulation. Subsequently, the MC SE of single-event dose-mean specific energy was adopted as the convergence criterion for simulation. Long-range radiation effects were effectively compensated, relaxing spatial-extent requirements for TAT MC geometries. The source-mixture scheme allowed reuse of elementary microdosimetric data, supporting efficient factor analysis for diverse heterogeneous conditions. Coupled with cell-line parameters and the non-Poisson-corrected microdosimetric kinetic model, the analytic results yielded dose-response characteristics consistent with prior studies of TAT.
conclusionsThe framework enables trace-back variance analysis and microdosimetry-compatible variance reduction. This enables precision-controlled MC microdosimetry in TAT, and supports flexible analysis of heterogeneity factors and reliable microdosimetric assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.