ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2026
Integrating Audiovisual Data for Short-Term Particulate Matter Concentration Prediction on Urban Sidewalks.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urban air pollution severely impacts pedestrians on sidewalks, yet traditional fixed-site monitoring lacks the spatial coverage needed for fine-scale exposure assessment due to high costs. This study proposes a novel machine-learning framework to predict short-term sidewalk PM2.5 and PM1 concentrations using multimodal audiovisual features extracted from self-collected street-view videos, alongside meteorological and background pollution data. Based on a mobile monitoring campaign in Shenzhen, China, we evaluated multiple models (linear regression, XGBoost, and LightGBM) across different temporal resolutions (10 s and 1 min) and validation strategies. LightGBM achieved the best performance, yielding R2 values of 0.64-0.65 for 10 s predictions and 0.80 for 1 min predictions under random cross-validation. Under rigorous spatial cross-validation, the model maintained moderate generalizability, with R2 reaching 0.41-0.48 at the 1 min resolution. Furthermore, developing a hybrid model that incorporated static geospatial context further improved the overall predictive accuracy. Variable interpretation revealed that while background PM and meteorology were dominant predictors, dynamic audio-derived features and visual indicators provided substantial additional predictive power. These findings demonstrate that integrating multimodal audiovisual sensing with ancillary data enables scalable, high-resolution estimation of street-level PM, effectively complementing conventional monitoring for urban air-quality management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.