ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2026
Forensic bruise documentation with alternate light sources: Preliminary observation on deceased individuals in a routine illuminated autopsy setting.
Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alternate light sources (ALS) have been suggested to improve bruise visibility for medicolegal evaluations. Previous studies have recommended darkened conditions; however, this does not reflect real-life autopsy settings, where multiple examinations are conducted simultaneously and turning off the lights is neither practical nor safe. This study evaluated the use of ALS for documenting bruises under normal lighting conditions without altering the autopsy setup. We photographed 161 bruises (99 recent, 62 non-recent) using CrimeLite® AUTO (Foster+Freeman) under common white light (CWL), violet ALS with 415 nm long-pass (VLP), violet ALS with 415 nm band-pass (VBP), and blue ALS with 445 nm long-pass (BLP). Bruises were classified as recent or non-recent based on the presence of yellow coloration. Visibility was scored using a "modified" Bruise Visibility Scale (BVS), and surface area was measured. Observer variability was assessed using Cohen's kappa (κ) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC); logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate BVS and size across lighting sources. We found that ALS did not enhance bruise visibility compared to CWL. VBP and BLP reduced visibility, while VLP showed occasional improvements but without statistical significance. Surface area measurements indicated that VLP visualizes bruises with larger dimensions than under CWL, whereas BLP and VBP did not. Observer agreement for the four BVS categories yielded κ values ranging from moderate to substantial, while ICCs showed excellent agreement for surface-area measurements for most light sources. Despite its limitations, the study suggests that ALS, particularly VLP, may have potential utility for bruise documentation under normal lighting conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.