ArticleCancer2026
Results of second-line therapy in adult Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Article in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe approval of the BCR::ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and blinatumomab have improved outcomes in Ph-positive B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, patients still relapse, and their outcomes in the TKI era have yet to be defined.
methodsPatients with relapsed/primary refractory Philadelphia chromosome (pH)-positive B-ALL ≥16 years old treated in first salvage from 1992 to 2025 were analyzed.
resultsA total of 165 patients (median age, 48; range, 17-78 years) were analyzed. The overall complete remission (CR) rate was 80%. By multivariate analysis, only the use of TKIs was associated with a significant benefit for achieving CR. The median overall survival (OS) was 15 months. The 3-year OS rate was 31%. The 3-year OS rate was 57% with third-generation TKI combinations, 38% with second-generation TKI combinations, 8% with imatinib combinations, and 0% without TKIs. By multivariate analysis, three variables were independently predictive of survival: TKI-based therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.10-0.49; p values all <.001 for each TKI vs. no TKI), blinatumomab-based therapy (HR, 0.36; p = .0058), and white blood cell ≥50 × 10
conclusionsThis study establishes a modern expectation of outcome of Ph-positive B-cell ALL treated in salvage 1. Third-generation TKI plus blinatumomab combinations should be given consideration in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.