Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42482332›Full record

ReviewJournal of chest surgery2026

Surgical Management of Congenital Lung Malformations: Indications, Timing, and Outcomes.

Chang Hyun Kang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of chest surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chang Hyun KangDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1612-1937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital lung malformations (CLMs) represent a heterogeneous group of developmental anomalies increasingly detected through prenatal imaging. The optimal management of asymptomatic patients remains controversial. This review summarizes current evidence regarding surgical indications, timing, techniques, and outcomes. Although some studies report low rates of symptom development, longer-term data suggest that many initially asymptomatic patients eventually become symptomatic and require surgery. Delayed intervention after infection is associated with increased operative difficulty and morbidity. Additionally, the potential risk of malignant transformation, though rare, supports consideration of early resection. Minimally invasive approaches, particularly thoracoscopic surgery, have demonstrated superior postoperative recovery, musculoskeletal outcomes, and pulmonary function compared with thoracotomy. While lung-sparing procedures are increasingly utilized, careful patient selection is essential to minimize residual disease. Overall, early elective resection using minimally invasive techniques appears safe and may optimize long-term outcomes in patients with CLMs.

Indexed as

CongenitalCongenital abnormalitiesLung diseasesPulmonary functionThoracic surgeryThoracoscopy

Identifiers

PMID42482332
PMCPMC13542683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.