ReviewJournal of chest surgery2026
Surgical Management of Congenital Lung Malformations: Indications, Timing, and Outcomes.
Review in Journal of chest surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital lung malformations (CLMs) represent a heterogeneous group of developmental anomalies increasingly detected through prenatal imaging. The optimal management of asymptomatic patients remains controversial. This review summarizes current evidence regarding surgical indications, timing, techniques, and outcomes. Although some studies report low rates of symptom development, longer-term data suggest that many initially asymptomatic patients eventually become symptomatic and require surgery. Delayed intervention after infection is associated with increased operative difficulty and morbidity. Additionally, the potential risk of malignant transformation, though rare, supports consideration of early resection. Minimally invasive approaches, particularly thoracoscopic surgery, have demonstrated superior postoperative recovery, musculoskeletal outcomes, and pulmonary function compared with thoracotomy. While lung-sparing procedures are increasingly utilized, careful patient selection is essential to minimize residual disease. Overall, early elective resection using minimally invasive techniques appears safe and may optimize long-term outcomes in patients with CLMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.