ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Case report of penetrating coronary artery ulcer of the right coronary artery in a middle-aged man presenting with recurrent chest pain.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPenetrating Coronary artery ulcers (PCAU) are rarely reported disruption of vascular wall integrity believed to arise from plaque rupture. Its clinical presentation often mimics other acute coronary syndromes, making timely recognition challenging. Despite their potential association with adverse cardiovascular events, they are poorly understood and no consensus guideline for their management exists. 64-year-old man with complex medical history including a prior coronary artery disease with stent implantation, who presented with recurrent chest pain. Cardiac catheterization identified a grade II penetrating ulcer of the proximal right coronary artery with no obstructive lesions, and he was subsequently managed conservatively with good outcome. DISCUSSION: Penetrating coronary artery ulcers are rare clinical findings with no specific treatment guidelines. Given the limited evidence base and the potential for progression to dissection, thrombosis, or myocardial ischemia, detailed reporting of PCAU presentations is essential to guide clinical practice. Further research is crucial to develop evidence-based treatment guidelines, especially with the advancements in intravascular imaging.
conclusionPenetrating coronary artery ulcer remains a rare but clinically important condition. Early recognition with multimodality imaging and individualized management strategies are key to preventing adverse outcomes. This report expands the existing evidence base and provides valuable reference material for clinicians facing similar scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.