SynthesisBMC medical education2026
Mapping the evidence on public health competency assessment strategies in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review.
Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing complexity of health systems and the growing importance of social determinants of health require physicians trained with a population-based perspective. However, assessment of public health competencies in undergraduate medical education remains heterogeneous, with limited conceptual integration and lack of standardised approaches.
objectiveTo map and characterise the scientific evidence on strategies used to assess public health competencies in undergraduate medical students.
methodsA scoping review was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, LILACS and IEEE Xplore for studies published between January 2011 and January 2026. Studies involving undergraduate medical students and addressing assessment of public health competencies were included. Data were extracted using a structured matrix and synthesised narratively.
resultsThirty studies were included, demonstrating marked heterogeneity across study designs, including randomised controlled trials, observational, qualitative and mixed-methods studies. Assessment strategies were organised into key domains, ranging from knowledge-based evaluations to performance-based approaches in authentic settings. Experiential strategies, such as community-based learning and service learning, enabled integration of social determinants of health into assessment processes. A continuum of evaluative complexity was identified, reflecting a shift from cognitive assessment towards multidimensional, context-based and performance-oriented approaches. Most studies were conducted in high-income countries.
conclusionsAssessment of public health competencies is evolving towards integrated, contextualised and performance-based models. However, the absence of standardised frameworks and validated instruments limits comparability across studies. Advancing towards longitudinal and programmatic assessment models is essential to strengthen medical training and align it with contemporary population health challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42482257What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.