Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42482192›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Midwives' experiences of maternal death surveillance and response: insights from Mwanza District Hospital, Malawi.

Wakhonderachi Temweka Likha, Gaily Lungu, Fikile Singano, Martha Kamanga

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wakhonderachi Temweka LikhaMalawi College of Health Sciences, Private Bag 396, Blantyre, Malawi. wakholikha@gmail.com.
Gaily LunguDepartment of Midwifery, School of Maternal, Neonatal & Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, P/Bag 360, Blantyre, Malawi.
Fikile SinganoDepartment of Midwifery, School of Maternal, Neonatal & Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, P/Bag 360, Blantyre, Malawi.
Martha KamangaDepartment of Midwifery, School of Maternal, Neonatal & Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, P/Bag 360, Blantyre, Malawi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the introduction of the Maternal Death Surveillance and Response (MDSR) program in Malawi in 2002, preventable maternal deaths remain a significant concern. Malawi's maternal mortality ratio (MMR) declined from 439 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2015 to 224 in 2024 (MDHS 2024) but remains well above the Sustainable Development Goal target of fewer than 70 deaths per 100,000 live births by 2030. In 2023/2024, Mwanza District Hospital recorded nine alarming maternal deaths. This study explored midwives' experiences in maternal death identification, notification, and reporting within the MDSR cycle.

methodsAn exploratory descriptive qualitative design was employed. Nineteen purposively selected midwives participated in semi-structured audio-recorded interviews. Data were analyzed thematically following Braun and Clarke's six steps, supported by NVivo 12 software. Ethical approval was obtained from the College of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (P.10/23-0358).

resultsMidwives identified challenges across all stages of the MDSR cycle. During identification and notification, psychological distress and cross-border care complexities hampered accurate reporting. In the review and analysis stage, inconsistent documentation, weak coordination, and a prevailing culture of blame limited open discussion and learning. In the response and action stage, follow-up was fragmented, and fear of punishment discouraged active participation. In the monitoring and evaluation stage, feedback loops were weak, and lessons from reviews were not consistently shared with frontline providers, undermining system-wide improvement.

conclusionMidwives at Mwanza District Hospital experience significant emotional strain and systemic barriers in executing MDSR responsibilities. Strengthening support for timely identification and notification, promoting a blame-free culture in reviews, ensuring structured follow-up actions, and reinforcing feedback mechanisms are critical to improving maternal death surveillance and response. SIGNIFICANCE: Organizing midwives' experiences through the MDSR cycle highlights key intervention points. Addressing gaps in identification, review, response, and monitoring can enhance both provider well-being and system accountability, ultimately contributing to the reduction of preventable maternal mortality in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelMaternal DeathMidwiferyPopulation SurveillanceAdultFemaleHospitals, DistrictHumansMalawiMaternal MortalityPregnancyQualitative ResearchMalawiMaternal deathMaternal death surveillance and responseMidwives

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.