Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42482162›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026

Assessment of United States Food and Drug Administration Approval of Cell and Gene Therapies.

Mahnum Shahzad, Magdi Elsallab, Maximilian Siebert, Florence T Bourgeois

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mahnum ShahzadDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7170-7228
Magdi ElsallabHarvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9574-3496
Maximilian SiebertHarvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4385-5773
Florence T BourgeoisHarvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7798-4560

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development and use of cell and gene therapies (CGTs) are rapidly expanding and challenge traditional regulatory paradigms. With growing clinical use and high costs, rigorous evaluation of regulatory oversight by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is increasingly important. We characterized premarketing evidence and postmarketing requirements and commitments for all 38 CGTs approved by the FDA through December 31, 2025. Most therapies used special designations and expedited pathways (86.8% had an orphan designation; 92.1% used an expedited pathway). The mean number of pivotal studies required for CGT approval was 1.6 (SD 1.7), with 73.7% approved based on a single study, and 44.7% relying solely on studies with surrogate endpoints. Reliance on postmarketing evidence generation was common, with 73.4% of products approved with at least one postmarketing requirement or commitment, totaling 52 studies. However, only 17.9% of CGTs had a postmarketing study that included a primary clinical efficacy endpoint, and most studies remain ongoing. These findings suggest that current regulatory approaches prioritize timely access but often rely on limited premarket data and postmarketing studies that infrequently assess clinical efficacy outcomes. Ensuring that requirements for preapproval trials and postmarketing studies are adequate and appropriately calibrated to the level of uncertainty and benefit-risk profile of individual CGTs may better support the goal of providing patients with timely, innovative, and transformative treatments that have the greatest potential to advance disease treatment.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyDrug ApprovalGenetic TherapyUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationHumansProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42482162
PMCPMC13388474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.