ArticleBMC psychology2026
An exploratory study of preoperative psychological assessment for gender-affirming surgery: personality traits, defense mechanisms, and cultural factors in a chinese sample.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChinese transgender individuals seeking gender-affirming surgery (GAS) face legal, familial, and healthcare barriers, yet data on their psychological characteristics and surgical motivations remain limited. This exploratory study examined personality traits, defense styles, and self-reported motivations in a Chinese clinical sample.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, 37 transgender individuals (transmasculine participants, n = 25; transfeminine participants, n = 12) completed the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ), Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ), and a self-developed GAS-related questionnaire. EPQ scores were compared with Chinese national normative values in an exploratory manner using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Associations between EPQ and DSQ dimensions were examined using Spearman correlations with false discovery rate correction. Findings from the self-developed questionnaire were analyzed descriptively.
resultsIn exploratory comparisons with Chinese national norms, participants showed lower Extraversion (p < 0.001), higher Neuroticism (p = 0.012), and higher Lie scores (p < 0.001), while Psychoticism did not differ significantly (p = 0.976). After FDR correction, Neuroticism remained positively associated with immature defenses (ρ = 0.646, FDR-adjusted p < 0.001), middle defenses (ρ = 0.468, FDR-adjusted p = 0.032), and hidden defenses (ρ = 0.428, FDR-adjusted p = 0.043). Descriptive questionnaire findings indicated that common motivations included enhancing self-confidence, changing the gender marker on official identification documents, and increasing social acceptance. Cronbach's α was 0.82 for the Likert-type domains, with subscale values ranging from 0.78 to 0.85.
conclusionThis exploratory study provides preliminary insights into personality traits, defense styles, and self-reported motivations among Chinese transgender individuals seeking GAS. The findings contribute context-specific descriptive data to the existing literature and may inform future research using larger, multicenter samples, appropriately matched comparison groups, and validated assessment instruments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.