ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2026
Who will pay for the malaria vaccines in Africa?
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malaria remains one of the most persistent infectious threats in sub-Saharan Africa, where the burden of disease and mortality are disproportionately concentrated among children under five years of age. The World Health Organization's endorsement of the RTS, S/AS01 vaccine in October 2021 and the R21/Matrix-M vaccine in October 2023 represents a major scientific advance; however, the central question confronting African policymakers, donors, and governments is no longer scientific but financial. In 2024, an estimated 282 million malaria cases and 610,000 deaths occurred worldwide, with the African region accounting for more than 94% of cases and 95% of deaths. The Vaccine Alliance has committed to malaria vaccine introduction through its advance market commitment model; however, its tiered co-financing framework places a fiscal burden on the highest-burden, lowest-income countries. The experience of the COVID-19 pandemic illustrates how vaccine nationalism and concentrated manufacturing can delay equitable access in Africa. Effective vaccine delivery also requires sustained investment in cold-chain systems, the health workforce, and immunisation platforms reaching conflict-affected areas, the costs of which are frequently excluded from procurement estimates. Most African Union member states remain below the Abuja Declaration target of 15% national health spending, sustaining dependence on external financing and undermining health sovereignty. Coordinated action by donors, governments, and manufacturers, including predictable multi-year financing, differential pricing, and measurable domestic allocations, is needed to prevent distribution by purchasing power rather than by epidemiological need. This comment aims to examine who will finance malaria vaccines in Africa and how equitable and sustainable delivery can be secured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.