ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
DynaTCR: dynamic hard-negative ensemble graph learning improves TCR-epitope binding prediction.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationT-cell receptors (TCRs) recognize antigenic peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules and are central to adaptive immunity. Computational prediction of TCR-epitope binding (TEB) can accelerate immunotherapy development, yet remains hampered by limited labeled data, false-negative noise in unobserved pairs, and over-smoothing in graph-based models.
resultsWe present DynaTCR, a dynamic graph ensemble learning framework for TEB prediction. DynaTCR encodes TCR and epitope sequences with protein language model embeddings and organizes them into a bipartite interaction graph. A graph regularization-variance-preserving aggregation (GR-VPA) encoder stabilizes message propagation and alleviates over-smoothing, while a global attention layer captures long-range dependencies. Multiple base learners are trained with iteratively updated hard-negative samples to reduce false-negative predictions. Under the StrictTCR evaluation protocol on four public datasets, DynaTCR achieves AUC improvements of 4.0-8.2 percentage points over the strongest existing method and up to 15.8 percentage points in AUPR. On the most stringently curated dataset, DynaTCR attains an AUC of 95.1%. Furthermore, on an independent structure-derived test set, DynaTCR achieves the highest AUC (72.6%) among all compared methods, demonstrating its robustness and effectiveness for TEB prediction and candidate prioritization. AVAILABILITY: Source code and data can be downloaded from: https://github.com/2014402680/TEB/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.