ReviewJournal of translational medicine2026
TCM-derived immunometabolic modulators as systems adjuvants for CAR-T therapy in solid tumors: evidence hierarchy and translational roadmap.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSolid-tumor CAR-T therapy remains limited by antigen heterogeneity, stromal exclusion, abnormal vasculature, immunosuppressive myeloid and fibroblast niches, hypoxia, nutrient competition, mitochondrial stress and inflammatory toxicity. These barriers indicate that solid-tumor CAR-T therapy is not only a receptor-engineering problem but also a systems pharmacology problem requiring rational combinatorial modulation. MAIN BODY: This review evaluates whether traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)-derived formulations, botanical compounds and microbiota-derived natural-product metabolites can be developed as mechanism-defined adjuvants for solid-tumor CAR-T therapy. We classify evidence by proximity to CAR-T systems, but also emphasize that evidence ranking must be interpreted within specific use cases. Current evidence remains limited and predominantly preclinical, yet it supports testable intervention concepts involving purified ex vivo metabolic conditioning, in vivo tumor conditioning, concurrent maintenance, toxicity modulation and delivery engineering. We further propose a translational framework linking product identity, exposure window, target annotation, immune-functional potency, CAR-T manufacturing compatibility, pharmacodynamic biomarkers, host-model suitability, lymphodepletion compatibility and safety assessment.
conclusionTCM-derived agents should not be developed as empirical supplements for CAR-T therapy. Translation should require defined product identity, target clarity, use-case-specific evidence, exposure window matched to product class, CAR construct, tumor context, manufacturing compatibility, immune-functional potency testing, suitable immune models, lymphodepletion drug-interaction assessment, safety assessment and biomarker-rich early-phase trials with explicit go/no-go criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.