ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
Bypass neural interfaces for paralysis: clinical translation, challenges and future directions.
Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in neural recording, real-time decoding and bioelectronic stimulation have enabled a new class of systems that re-establish functional communication across disrupted neural pathways. In the context of paralysis, these neural bypass interfaces link upstream neural intent to effector activation downstream of the lesion, effectively circumventing sites of injury within the nervous system to restore volitional movement. In this review, we define neural bypass interfaces as an emerging category of bioelectronic medicine, distinct from conventional brain-computer interfaces and neuromodulation technologies. We first outline key neurophysiological and systems-level considerations underlying bypass design, before tracing their evolution from bench to bedside. We then focus on the clinical translation challenges that govern real-world deployment, specifically signal stability and fidelity, stimulation performance, decoding robustness, closed-loop integration and long-term implant viability. Importantly, this review highlights two emerging directions that may shape the next generation of neural bypasses: the use of the spinal cord itself as a source of neural intent, and the development of bidirectional bypasses integrating sensory feedback to enable more adaptive, physiologically aligned control. Ultimately, neural bypasses may go beyond simply restoring movement to drive biological recovery, redefining neurorestorative therapies for paralysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.