ArticleBMC oral health2026
Automated forensic human identification on dental panoramic radiographs using transformer-based detection with supervised metric learning.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDental radiographs are a primary modality for human identification in disaster victim identification, when fingerprint and visual recognition are not feasible. As antemortem (AM) databases grow, exhaustive AM-postmortem (PM) comparisons by expert visual inspection scale poorly to large reference databases. An automated method that pre-screens an AM database into a ranked shortlist of candidates for expert verification would address this bottleneck.
methodsThe framework integrates a Detection Transformer (DETR) with a Circle Loss objective. DETR detects individual teeth and outputs 256-dimensional embeddings from the detection queries. Circle Loss then optimizes these embeddings to minimize same-individual pair distances and maximize different-individual pair distances. Evaluated on 1,029 individuals with paired AM-PM DPRs, identification performance was assessed by deriving the retrieval indices including Rank-K accuracy, mean average precision (mAP), and normalized discounted cumulative gain (nDCG). This detection-based approach was benchmarked against representative convolutional neural network (CNN)-based detectors, including Faster Region-based CNN (Faster R-CNN), RetinaNet, and You Only Look Once (YOLOv9), as well as image-level representations that bypass tooth localization.
resultsThe framework achieved 65.4% Rank-1 and 87.4% Rank-10 accuracy, 72.8% mAP, and 75.3% nDCG, consistently outperforming CNN-based detection architectures. Detection-based structural representations improved Rank-1 accuracy by 44.4% over image-level counterparts, with embeddings capturing fine-grained anatomical details such as root curvature and arch configuration.
conclusionsThe proposed detection-based metric learning framework provides a practical pre-screening tool that compresses exhaustive AM-PM database comparisons into a ranked shortlist of candidates for forensic expert verification. The system is intended to operate upstream of expert verification rather than to replace in disaster victim identification and missing person investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.