ArticleBMC urology2026
Largest pediatric scrotal lipoma with perineal extension: a rare case expanding the anatomic spectrum and diagnostic pitfalls.
Article in BMC urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScrotal lipomas are exceptionally rare in children, with only a few cases reported worldwide and most measuring less than 7 cm. Giant pediatric scrotal lipomas with multi-compartmental perineal extension have not been previously described. This case presents the largest documented pediatric scrotal lipoma, with an analytic framework for understanding diagnostic pitfalls and rare visual documentation of surgical anatomy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 5-year-old boy presented with six months of progressive left scrotal swelling clinically consistent with a large hydrocele. Ultrasound suggested heterogeneous fatty tissue, while MRI performed elsewhere was interpreted as omental herniation. Standard inguinal exploration for presumed hydrocele revealed a normal testis without a hernia or fluid collection, prompting intraoperative diagnostic reassessment. Subsequent scrotal exploration identified a well-encapsulated lipoma measuring 14 × 12 × 7 cm, located between the dartos and scrotal skin with deep extensions to the pubic arch, penile root, and pelvic floor. Complete excision was achieved while preserving all neurovascular structures. Histopathology confirmed mature lipoma. At one-year follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic with symmetric testes and no recurrence.
conclusionsThis case demonstrates how ultra-rare pediatric conditions can closely mimic common scrotal diseases, leading to diagnostic anchoring despite supportive imaging. It documents, to the best of our knowledge, the largest pediatric scrotal lipoma to date and the only case with extensive perineal extension. Intraoperative diagnostic flexibility, combined with meticulous anatomical dissection, enables safe and complete excision with excellent functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.