ArticleBMC health services research2026
Unveiling the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on quality indicators of leprosy services in Brazil: an ecological study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has affected health services around the world. As a result, the control of endemic infectious diseases has been significantly hampered. This study aimed to quantify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on quality indicators of leprosy services in Brazil in 2020 and 2021.
methodsThis is an ecological study with 3 indicators: 1- Proportion of new leprosy cases with degree of physical disability assessed at diagnosis; 2- Proportion of contacts of new cases examined; 3- Proportion of leprosy cured among new cases. The period from 2015 to 2019 was considered pre-pandemic for the purpose of calculating the minimum expected for the pandemic years (2020 and 2021). To determine the impact, the percentage of variation was used, taking into account the values of the indicators expected for 2020 and 2021, using the average of the last five years, and the values observed in the same years. The impact was quantified as a percentage.
resultsBrazil's performance in the three indicators analyzed was considered regular (between ≥ 75% and 89.9%), both in the pre-pandemic period and in the first two years. In the assessment of the degree of physical disability, the number of countries with a proportion greater than 90% decreased from 11 (expected value) to 7 (in 2020) and 9 (in 2021). In the evaluation of contacts, four states were expected to achieve the target (> 90%), but only three achieved the indicator in 2020 and one in 2021 (Tocantins). As for the cure rate, four states were expected to achieve values above 90%, but only three did so in 2020 and two in 2021.
conclusionThe study showed a negative impact on the quality indicators of leprosy services in Brazil, which was more pronounced in 2021 (for contact examination and cure indicators) than in 2020, making it even more difficult to control the disease in the country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42482029What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.