ReviewWorld journal of surgical oncology2026
Frailty in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer: a narrative review of assessment, outcomes and prehabilitation.
Review in World journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOlder adults with lung cancer are increasingly being considered for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), including segmentectomy or lobectomy with lymph node assessment. Although VATS reduces surgical trauma compared with thoracotomy, it does not eliminate heterogeneity in physiological reserve, treatment tolerance, or postoperative recovery. Frailty may therefore complement conventional preoperative assessment, which is typically based on chronological age, comorbidity burden, pulmonary function, and cardiac risk. METHODS AND MAIN
findingsThis narrative review summarises the evidence on frailty assessment, perioperative outcomes, and prehabilitation strategies in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery, with a particular emphasis on VATS. Practical tools, such as the Clinical Frailty Scale and 4-metre gait speed, may support routine screening because they are brief, feasible, and clinically interpretable. More comprehensive approaches, including multidimensional frailty indices, nutritional assessment, sarcopenia evaluation, and comprehensive geriatric assessment, may be useful for selected patients. Available evidence suggests that frailty is associated with postoperative pulmonary complications, prolonged hospitalisation, non-home discharge, increased healthcare utilisation, and mortality after lung resection. However, direct evidence from frail patients with lung cancer undergoing VATS remains limited, and many recommendations are extrapolated from mixed thoracic surgery cohorts, studies of open lung resection, geriatric oncology, and non-thoracic surgical literature.
conclusionsFrailty should be considered an actionable component of perioperative risk stratification, rather than a stand-alone criterion for determining surgical eligibility or the extent of VATS resection. Future studies in thoracic oncology should define optimal frailty assessment pathways and determine whether frailty-guided interventions can improve short-term recovery, long-term functional outcomes, tolerance of adjuvant therapy, and oncological outcomes after minimally invasive lung cancer surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.