ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Mechanical complications and radiographic outcomes following sacral-only versus spinopelvic fixation in long-segment fusion terminating at the sacrum: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLong-segment fusion terminating at the sacrum is associated with a substantial risk of distal mechanical complications, including screw loosening and pseudarthrosis. Whether spinopelvic fixation is associated with improved construct durability and maintenance of sagittal alignment compared with sacral-only fixation remains clinically relevant.
methodsThis retrospective single-center cohort study included 100 adult patients undergoing posterior long-segment fusion involving four or more motion segments terminating at the sacrum between 2000 and 2024. Patients were stratified into sacral-only fixation and spinopelvic fixation groups. Radiographic outcomes included screw loosening, pseudarthrosis, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) over a standardized two-year follow-up.
resultsBaseline characteristics were comparable between groups, although anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at L5-S1 was performed more frequently in the spinopelvic fixation group (46% vs. 14%, p < 0.001). Sacral-only fixation was associated with higher rates of pseudarthrosis (48% vs. 12%, p < 0.001) and clinically relevant screw loosening (34% vs. 6%, p = 0.004). Spinopelvic fixation was associated with better maintenance of PI-LL mismatch during follow-up, whereas final SVA values were comparable between groups. Both groups demonstrated clinically meaningful functional improvement, although recovery occurred earlier in the spinopelvic fixation cohort.
conclusionSpinopelvic fixation was associated with lower rates of distal mechanical complications and improved maintenance of postoperative spinopelvic alignment following long-segment fusion terminating at the sacrum. Given the retrospective study design and the unequal distribution of ALIF, these findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than causal but may support consideration of spinopelvic fixation in patients at increased risk of distal construct failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.