ArticleBMC oral health2026
Regenerative capacity of human dental pulp stem cells versus their exosomes on surgically induced submandibular gland defects in rats.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical excision of salivary gland (SG) tumors frequently results in glandular tissue loss and long-term functional impairment. Human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) and their derived Exosomes (hDPSCs-Exos) have emerged as promising regenerative strategies. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare the regenerative capacity of hDPSCs versus their Exos on surgically induced defects in rats' submandibular SGs.
methodsSeventy-two male Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned to four groups (n=18). Group I (negative control): no surgical intervention. The remaining rats underwent a circular defect preparation on the right submandibular SG, then the dissected areas were injected circumferentially with different treatments according to group assignment. Group II (positive control): 1ml phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Group III (hDPSCs group): 1×105 hDPSCs suspended in 1ml PBS, and group IV (hDPSCs-Exos): hDPSCs-Exos (20µg/ml) suspended in 1 ml PBS. Six rats from each group were euthanized at 3, 7, and 14 days postoperatively. Histological evaluation, immunohistochemical analysis (IHC) of Collagen-I (COL-I), and quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) for aquaporin-5 (Aqua-5) gene expression were performed, followed by relevant statistical analyses.
resultsThe positive control group showed marked acinar disorganization and fibrosis. The hDPSCs-treated group demonstrated partial regeneration, whereas the exosome-treated group showed near-normal architecture by day 14. Statistical analysis showed significant differences between groups as COL-I expression decreased significantly over time, with the lowest levels in the exosome group indicating tissue regeneration without fibrosis. Aqua-5 expression increased significantly, showing superior molecular restoration in the exosome group approaching negative control baselines by day 14 that raises hope toward functional recovery followed by hDPSCs and finally positive control groups.
conclusionsBoth hDPSCs and their exosomes promote regeneration of surgically injured submandibular glands. The exosomes-treated group demonstrated superior structural and molecular recovery approaching normal architecture, supporting their potentiality as a safer and effective cell-free regenerative therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.