Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42482012›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2026

Assessment of plan-execution fidelity in a fully digital workflow using custom-made plates for mandibular fracture repair: a prospective pilot study.

Riad Kamal Riad, Eman Shalaby, Hesham ElHawary

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07499726 (Precision of Patient Specific 3D Printed Occlusal Stent, Surgical Guide, and Patient Specific Titanium Plates in Management of Mandibular Fracture), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07499726 completednot on this map

Precision of Patient Specific 3D Printed Occlusal Stent, Surgical Guide, and Patient Specific Titanium Plates in Management of Mandibular Fracture (Case Series)

TypeobservationalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled6ConditionsMandibular FracturesArmsPatient-Specific 3D Printed Occlusal Stent, Surgical Guide, and Titanium Plates
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Riad Kamal RiadDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0009-0007-9691-9829
Eman ShalabyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-6703-8148
Hesham ElHawaryDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. hesham.elhawary@dentistry.cu.edu.eg.ORCID 0000-0002-7052-3283

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVirtual surgical planning (VSP) and custom-made plates (patient-specific implants, PSIs) are increasingly used in mandibular fracture repair, but quantitative data on plan-execution fidelity remain limited. Plan-execution fidelity refers to the geometric agreement between the virtually planned and postoperative mandibular morphology after image registration. The aim of this pilot study was to quantify plan-execution fidelity and to describe patient-reported recovery in a fully digital, custom-plate workflow for non-comminuted mandibular fractures, while generating hypotheses about plate design.

methodsSix patients with non-comminuted mandibular body or parasymphyseal fractures underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using a fully digital workflow. Plan-execution fidelity (the primary feasibility outcome) was assessed as the mean absolute error (MAE) of 10 predefined measurements after iterative closest point (ICP) registration on the contralateral ramus and condyle (condylar metrics excluded a priori). Measurements were performed by three blinded observers. The Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) was recorded preoperatively and at 1, 4, and 12 weeks. Analyses are purely descriptive; no inferential statistics are reported.

resultsIn this six-patient cohort, the primary (patient-level) MAE ranged from 0.25 to 0.81 mm (mean 0.48 mm, SD 0.21 mm). At the level of individual measurements (60 readings from the same six patients), the MAE was 0.45 mm. OHIP-14 total scores improved from 48.2 (SD 5.6) preoperatively to 5.2 (SD 4.1) at 12 weeks. Plate design, indication, and chronological order were structurally confounded; therefore, no comparative interpretation is possible.

conclusionsIn this pilot cohort, a fully digital workflow using custom-made plates was associated with submillimetre plan-execution deviation (mean 0.48 mm) within the registration framework used. The workflow was technically feasible and showed close correspondence between the virtual plan and postoperative morphology, although this geometric agreement should not be interpreted as independent anatomical accuracy. These preliminary findings provide a basis for future controlled studies aimed at validating clinical relevance, workflow efficiency, and cost-effectiveness in larger patient cohorts.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT07499726; registered 24 March 2026 (2026-03-24), retrospectively, after initiation of recruitment.

Indexed as

Bone PlatesFracture Fixation, InternalMandibular FracturesSurgery, Computer-AssistedWorkflowAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesComputer-assistedFracture fixationImagingInternalMandibular fracturesPatient-specific modelingPlan–execution fidelityPrintingQuality of lifeSurgeryThree-dimensional

Identifiers

PMID42482012
PMCPMC13397634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.