ArticleBMC palliative care2026
Communication and educational gaps in end-of-life care in Italian internal medicine wards: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnd-of-life (EOL) care is a frequent and complex aspect of internal medicine, yet data on physicians' training, clinical practices, and perceived challenges are limited. This study aimed to explore current practices, knowledge gaps, and unmet needs in EOL care among Italian internal medicine physicians and residents.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted under the auspices of the Piedmont-Liguria-Aosta Valley Section of the Italian Society of Internal Medicine (SIMI). The survey included 25 closed-ended questions addressing five domains: epidemiological, pharmacological, practical, psychological, and educational aspects of EOL care. Physicians actively involved in clinical care from multiple internal medicine wards participated voluntarily. Responses were collected anonymously via paper and online formats. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data. Differences between groups (specialists vs. residents, oncology/hematology vs. non-oncology wards, low vs. medium vs. high clinical intensity wards) were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Associations between ordinal variables were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. P-values were adjusted using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.
resultsOf approximately 7,400 invited physicians, 619 completed the survey (response rate ≈ 8.4%; median age 38 years; 60.5% female; 70.8% board-certified internists). More than 88% reported facing terminal patients at least weekly, yet only 2.5% were aware of Advance Directives for > 25% of inpatients. Use of sedatives and analgesics during terminal sedation varied, while discontinuation of active therapies, total parenteral nutrition (TPN), and transfusions was widely accepted. Internal protocols and dedicated multidisciplinary discussions were infrequently used. Most respondents reported difficulties communicating with patients and families at EOL. Formal training in EOL care was perceived as largely inadequate during undergraduate, residency, and postgraduate education. Compared with residents, board-certified internists more frequently reported postgraduate/Master training, whereas residents more frequently reported undergraduate and residency training in EOL. Exploratory correlation analyses generated hypotheses linking communication difficulties with patients to those with family members and training experiences across educational stages.
conclusionsThe study highlights substantial gaps in training, communication, and organizational support, independent of clinical setting. Structured education and integration of psychological support are urgently needed. These findings can inform curriculum development, hospital policies, and future research to improve physician preparedness and patient-centered EOL care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42482011What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.