ArticleBMC public health2026
An explainable geospatial framework for fine-scale Fatty Liver Disease (FLD) risk assessment: roles of social economy, built environment, and psychology.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFatty Liver Disease (FLD) has become the most common chronic liver disease worldwide, posing a great threat to public health. The existing methods are primarily based on clinical patient cohorts, supplemented by urban environmental factors, to elucidate biological mechanisms. However, insufficient geographic information and spatial resolution limit the public risk identification. This study integrates real and virtual multi-source data and proposes an explainable geospatial framework for street-level HS risk assessment.
methodsFirstly, based on prior medical knowledge, we construct an indicator system comprising three dimensions: social economy, built environment, and psychology (SBP). Then, the multi-model generalization and contribution voting strategy are used for preliminary analysis and optimization to identify key factors. Finally, based on ablation, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and spatial analysis, the independent and synergistic effects of different geographical features are revealed. This study takes 90 streets in Hefei, China, as the research area, and combines multi-regional and dynamic prediction (2023-2024) for verification.
resultsThe results show that the SBP framework achieves good performance in both multi-regional (R
conclusionsThis study focuses on the challenge of unknown the geospatial factors for HS risk in the context of urbanization, aiming to solve three core issues: insufficient spatial resolution, indicator framework design, and interpretability. The empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the SBP framework in identifying spatial heterogeneity of FLD, emphasizes its potential to identify regional differences and inform policy design. The method also provides a quantifiable scientific basis for precise FLD prevention and refined urban health management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42482007What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.