ArticleBMC oral health2026
In vitro evaluation of the mechanical properties of the resin-based composite three-dimensional digital space maintainers containing glass ionomer cements as fluoride sources in pediatric dentistry.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThree-dimensional (3D) printing technologies are increasingly used in the fabrication of space maintainers in pediatric dentistry. However, studies on improving the properties of space maintainer materials produced by digital methods remain limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of a 3D printing resin modified with glass ionomer cement powders as a new-generation composite space maintainer material for pediatric dentistry in terms of mechanical properties. This study addresses the question of whether a 3D printing resin modified with glass ionomer cement powders can serve as a new-generation space maintainer material with favorable mechanical properties. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo different glass ionomer cement powders as fluoride sources were added to a 3D printing resin at different concentrations, and four experimental groups were formed. Unmodified resin was used as the control group, while acrylic was used as the clinical reference group. Mechanical properties of the composite space maintainers were assessed using three-point bending and tensile tests.
resultsGroups with lower filler levels generally exhibited a more balanced mechanical performance. In the tensile analysis, filler type had a significant effect on maximum stress (p = 0.0135), while filler level had a significant effect on maximum stress (p < 0.0001), maximum strain (p = 0.0191), and elastic modulus (p < 0.0001). Low-level filler groups showed mechanical behavior closer to that of the acrylic reference material.
conclusionThe addition of glass ionomer powder altered the mechanical behavior depending on the filler ratio. Low filler levels provided better preservation of mechanical properties. Although these materials show potential as new-generation space maintainers in pediatric dentistry, further in vitro and in vivo studies are required to confirm their clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.