Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42481858›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2026

Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Sepsis and Septic Shock Among Patients with Documented Fever at Emergency Department Triage Using Patients' Historical Data.

Seung Jin Maeng, Ye Rim Lee, Se Uk Lee, Jae Yong Yu, Jung Won Choi, Guntak Lee, Jong Eun Park, Tae Gun Shin, Sung Yeon Hwang, Hee Yoon and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Seung Jin MaengDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0022-0703
Ye Rim LeeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8813-8079
Se Uk LeeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4201-2272
Jae Yong YuResearch Institute for Data Science and AI (Artificial Intelligence), Hallym University, Chuncheon-si, 24252, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6922-8538
Jung Won ChoiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1610-8483
Guntak LeeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1714-1400
Jong Eun ParkDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1058-990X
Tae Gun ShinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9657-1040
Sung Yeon HwangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1352-3009
Hee YoonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1297-9813
Won Chul ChaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2778-2992
Taerim KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8149-1205
Minha KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7178-0812
Hansol ChangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2624-0008
Sejin HeoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea. silversh06@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7387-4575

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute RS-2025-25460025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop an interpretable machine learning-based scoring system for predicting sepsis and septic shock among febrile patients at emergency department (ED) triage using longitudinal data. This retrospective, single-center study included adult patients, presented to ED of tertiary academic hospital with fever from January 2016 to December 2021. Using the AutoScore framework, we developed a novel scoring system for predicting sepsis and septic shock at the triage stage, incorporating nine variables and a maximum score of 29. The predictive performance of our score was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and its performance was compared with that of two existing scoring systems: the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS). Our model incorporated nine variables including initial vital signs, age, baseline platelet count, total bilirubin, and creatinine levels. Among these, initial systolic blood pressure was identified as the most important predictor. AUROC of our model was 0.844 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.812-0.875) in predicting septic shock and 0.703 (95% CI, 0.687-0.720) for sepsis. Compared to qSOFA ≥ 2 (AUROC: 0.605) and MEWS ≥ 5 (AUROC: 0.678), our scoring system demonstrated superior predictive performance for septic shock. For comparable specificity levels (ranging from 0.50 to 0.95), our scoring system achieved higher sensitivity than MEWS. Our scoring system is an interpretable and practical scoring tool for predicting sepsis and septic shock among patients with documented fever at ED triage using patient's longitudinal data.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalFeverMachine LearningSepsisShock, SepticTriageAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan Dysfunction ScoresPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveEmergency medicineMachine learningSepsisSeptic shockTriage

Identifiers

PMID42481858
PMCPMC13388409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.