ArticleNature medicine2026
An iPSC-derived neural progenitor cell therapy for subacute spinal cord injury: a phase 1 trial with long-term follow-up.
Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From neural development to regenerative medicine: A research journey in stem cell biology, spinal cord repair, and iPSC-based drug discovery.Regenerative therapy · 2026Review
- TheiScience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes irreversible motor and sensory deficits, and no therapy currently restores the damaged neural circuitry. Previous work has shown that transplantation of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neural stem/progenitor cells (NS/PCs) restored motor function in preclinical models of subacute SCI; however, the safety of this approach in humans remains unknown. Here we report results from a first-in-human, open-label study of iPSC-NS/PC transplantation in four patients with subacute cervical complete SCI. The primary safety end point was achieved, with no tumor formation or graft-related adverse events observed during 2-4 years of follow-up and stable graft sites on imaging. Exploratory efficacy was assessed as a secondary end point. Median improvement in the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury motor score from baseline (2 weeks after injury) to week 52 was 13 points (range 10-40), with two patients improving in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (grade A → C and A → D). These gains were numerically greater than spontaneous recovery observed in a registry-based cohort. This study provides clinical evidence that transplantation of human iPSC-NS/PCs into the injured spinal cord is feasible and safe under short-term immunosuppression, with findings supporting further clinical evaluation. The trial is registered at UMIN000035074 , UMIN000050104 and jRCTa031190228 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.