ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Impact of obesity on 30-day outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObesity may influence perioperative outcomes after colectomy, but whether contemporary laparoscopic colectomy yields comparable short-term outcomes in obese and non-obese patients remains clinically relevant. This study compared 30-day outcomes between obese and non-obese patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy and further examined conversion-related outcomes.
methodsAdult patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy between 2014 and 2025 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m
resultsAmong 2,097 patients, 550 (26.2%) were obese and 1,547 (73.8%) were non-obese. Obese patients had longer operative time (median 175 vs. 164 min, P = 0.004) and higher 30-day readmission (11.8% vs. 8.8%, P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in reoperation (4.0% vs. 3.7%, P = 0.79), mortality (0.7% vs. 1.5%, P = 0.27), conversion to open surgery (11.3% vs. 10.3%, P = 0.51), or LOS (median 4 days in both groups, P = 0.74). Major complications, including anastomotic leak, abscess, and surgical site infection, were comparable. In multivariable analysis, obesity remained independently associated with readmission (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.06-2.27, P = 0.02). Among converted patients, outcomes were comparable by obesity status. When BMI was analyzed continuously, increasing BMI was associated with anastomotic leak, but not with conversion, readmission, reoperation, mortality, abscess, ileus, or surgical site infection.
conclusionsObesity was associated with longer operative time and higher readmission, but not with increased conversion, reoperation, mortality, LOS, or most postoperative complications. Laparoscopic colectomy can be performed with acceptable short-term outcomes in obese patients in an experienced center, although obesity remains relevant for readmission risk and possible BMI-associated leak risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42481838What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.