ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Physical demands of hernia repair segments and the effect of exoskeleton support.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious work has examined the ergonomics of surgical procedures and the effect exoskeletons may have to support surgeons. However, hernia repair procedures are often dynamic, and current literature has yet to deduce physical demands across key segments of these procedures and examine how exoskeletons support surgeons across each of these segments.
methodsFour surgeons completed a total of 45 open and laparoscopic hernia repair procedures with and without a shoulder-support exoskeleton. Muscle activity and posture during control conditions (i.e., no exoskeleton) were used to characterize the physical demands of hernia repair procedures and were compared to the shoulder-support condition using a linear mixed effects model and t-test respectively.
resultsMesh deployment was identified as the most demanding segment for open hernia repair procedures and Preparing mesh was the most demanding for laparoscopic procedures. It was found that the shoulder-support exoskeleton reduced muscle activity in the upper trapezius at the expense of increased erector spinae muscle activity and increased neck flexion. During open procedures the shoulder-support exoskeleton largely increased muscle activity across each segment during laparoscopic procedures, but reduced trunk, shoulder, and neck flexion.
conclusionThe most demanding segments of hernia repair procedures were identified which may be targeted in future interventions to support the physical demands experienced by surgeons. Shoulder-support exoskeletons may be more appropriate for open hernia repair procedures and potentially detrimental for laparoscopic hernia repair procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.