Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42481833›Full record

ArticleLearning & behavior2026

Repeatable colour preferences predict information use in nest-building birds.

Benjamin A Whittaker, Henry R Swartwood García, Simran K Gill, Julia L Self, Lauren M Guillette

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin A WhittakerDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9316-6285
Henry R Swartwood GarcíaDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2166-6268
Simran K GillDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7166-2425
Julia L SelfDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1599-6079
Lauren M GuilletteDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada. guillett@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8777-6543

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than a century ago, naturalist Henry Smith Williams observed that birds nesting in his garden differed in their colour preferences for nest-building materials. His observations challenge the assumption that individuals within the same species respond similarly to the same colour cues, but the stability and consequences of these apparent preferences remain largely unexplored. Here, we tested the colour preferences of laboratory-raised zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) with access to pink and orange nest-building string. Birds were tested under conditions lacking relevant environmental cues, social information, or previous experience with the experimental colours. Individuals differed in both their preferred colour and the strength of preferences, which were more strongly repeatable across short-term than long-term intervals. We next asked whether these stable individual preferences influenced how birds respond to information, reanalyzing published social-learning datasets spanning different informational contexts. Stronger initial preferences generally predicted reduced use of socially demonstrated nonpreferred colours during nest building. These findings suggest that stable individual preferences represent an underappreciated source of variation in how animals acquire and use information during decision making.

Indexed as

Consistent individual differencesDecision-makingSocial learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.