ArticleClinical rheumatology2026
Development of a risk prediction model for rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease based on interpretable machine learning.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study constructed a predictive model for interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and explored the value of interpretable machine learning.
methodsThe medical records of 400 hospitalized RA patients treated in the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, from July 2021 to January 2025 were collected retrospectively. The patients were randomly allocated into a model training set (n = 280) and a validation set (n = 120) at a ratio of 7:3. Important feature variables were screened using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. The predictive models for ILD in RA patients were constructed using four machine learning algorithms: light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), logistic regression (LR), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and support vector machine (SVM). The performance of these models was measured based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA). The Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) algorithm was applied to conduct interpretability analysis for the optimal model.
resultsIn this study, the prevalence of ILD was found to be 15% (60/400). LASSO regression was used to select six feature variables: age, albumin, rheumatoid factor, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and leflunomide history. The XGBoost model displayed improved performance on the validation set, achieving an AUC of 0.841, along with a 0.937 accuracy and 0.899 F1-score, respectively. DCA also demonstrated favorable performance. Using the SHAP algorithm, the order of importance of the feature variables was age, albumin, rheumatoid factor, anti-CCP antibody, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and leflunomide history.
conclusionsIn conclusion, age, albumin, rheumatoid factor, anti-CCP antibody, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and leflunomide medication history are the key clinical predictors for RA-ILD. The XGBoost model combined with SHAP interpretation shows good predictive performance and clinical interpretability, which can assist clinicians in early risk assessment of RA-ILD. Key Points • Age, albumin, rheumatoid factor, anti-CCP antibody, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and leflunomide medication history are the key clinical predictors for RA-ILD. • The XGBoost model achieved superior predictive performance (AUC = 0.841) and outperformed LightGBM, LR, and SVM for RA-ILD risk stratification. • The SHAP algorithm was innovatively applied to achieve full model interpretability, clearly quantifying the contribution and effect direction of each risk factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42481813What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.