SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Brachioplasty in the Post-bariatric Patient-A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArm remodeling surgery is becoming increasingly popular due to the high impact of this anatomical unit in terms of life relationships, non-verbal language, and aesthetic concern. When referring to the post-bariatric brachioplasty (PBB), plenty of techniques have been proposed. However, PBB is challenging due to technical factors and patient's comorbidities, the evidence is limited, and there is a debate on the appropriate treatment choice. The present paper, through a systematic review, introduces a new classification system for PBB procedures, aiming to improve the management of post-bariatric patients.
methodsA systematic review was carried according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement by searching the PubMed (MEDLINE) database from December 2004 to December 2024 using the keywords ''brachioplasty OR arm contouring OR postbariatric brachioplasty OR (arm contouring AND weight loss) OR (arm contouring AND liposuction)". Original studies discussing PBB with a minimum of three clinical cases were eligible for inclusion.
resultsThe final synthesis included 39 papers and 1972 patients from articles published in the last 20 years. Various PBB surgical strategies and technical measures were evidenced.
conclusionsThe proposed classification allows a comprehensive assessment PBB techniques, possibly facilitating the treatment choice based on a patient's individual needs. Liposuction-assisted traditional PBB with the scar at the bicipital groove is effective for most post-bariatric patients. However, selected candidates may benefit from a more invasive treatment as suggested by this simple and intuitive surgical algorithm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42481790What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.