Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2026
Evidence for pro-cognitive benefits of cannabinoids in people with bipolar disorder.
Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cannabis use is highly prevalent among people with bipolar disorder, potentially due to a desire to self-medicate against symptoms, such as racing thoughts and poor concentration. Such symptoms are associated with attention and inhibitory control deficits, functions that are regulated in-part by temporal perception. Temporal perception is impaired in BD and is slowed by acute cannabis exposure. The effects of cannabis use (CU) on temporal perception and its associated cognitive functions in people with BD remains unclear. Here, we conducted two studies to 1) test for associations between chronic CU and cognitive function (i.e., attention and inhibitory control) and temporal perception in people with BD and healthy comparison (HC) adults, and 2) investigate the impact of acute Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) administration on such functions in a randomized clinical trial in non-CU people with BD and HC adults. Participants completed the Temporal Discrimination Task (TDT) and 5-Choice Continuous Performance Task (5C-CPT). In the chronic CU study, we observed that non-CU BD participants had significantly less precise timing compared to other groups, whereas BD + CU participants had comparable TDT performance to non-CU HC participants. Similarly, BD + CU, but not non-CU BD, participants had comparable 5C-CPT performance to non-CU HC. In the acute THC administration study, we observed faster timing in BD participants administered THC compared to placebo-treated HC participants. These data support that CU in people with BD reflect attempts to self-medicate. Future research will investigate whether cannabinoid-based treatments can remediate cognitive deficits in BD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.