Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42481728›Full record

SynthesisNature food2026

Food systems literacy in Indigenous health and nutrition.

Nitya Rao, Hélène Binesse, Aswathy Vinod

Abstract readSystematic ReviewReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nitya RaoSchool of Global Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. n.rao@uea.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6318-0147
Hélène BinesseSchool of Education and Lifelong Learning, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2630-9802
Aswathy VinodSchool of Global Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Funding

RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/T015411/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indigenous and traditional knowledge and practices have been acknowledged as offering potential solutions to the triple crises of climate change, biodiversity loss and poor health and nutrition. Yet, top-down, medicalized approaches dominate health and nutrition education and practice. On the basis of 39 peer-reviewed studies, this systematic review explores why this is the case and how it might be changed by strengthening food systems literacy-the knowledge, skills and communicative practices through which people engage with food systems. It also examines the roles of different worldviews and forms of knowledge production to highlight the challenges and good practices embedded in selected interventions with Indigenous communities. The studies included here encompass various communicative and learning practices, institutions and interventions around health and nutrition with Indigenous communities across regions. They offer insights into how culturally grounded, participatory approaches can advance food systems literacy and support pathways towards more sustainable, resilient, equitable and healthy food systems.

Indexed as

Food SupplyHealth LiteracyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansNutritional Status

Identifiers

PMID42481728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.