ArticleGene therapy2026
rAAV production cost analysis: Indication-specific cost per dose and reduction strategies.
Article in Gene therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AAV-mediated gene therapy for Alzheimer's disease: neuroprotective mechanisms and translational challenges.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vectors underpin many approved and late-stage gene therapies, yet manufacturing costs remain a major driver of therapy price. Here, we present the first comprehensive, platform-resolved cost analysis of rAAV production across three industrially relevant suspension platforms: transient transfection, baculovirus infection, and producer cell line (PCL). Using a bottom-up model, we decompose total cost-of-goods (COGs) into upstream, downstream, drug product, and quality control contributions at bioreactor scales from 50 L to 2000 L. We show that, on a per-batch basis, baculovirus infection is the most cost-efficient platform, followed by transient transfection and PCLs however, when costs are normalized to vector titer (cost per 1 × 10¹² vg), the ranking shifts, with transient transfection becoming the lowest-cost platform under the modeled assumptions, followed by baculovirus infection and PCL platforms, underscoring the dominant influence of productivity on unit cost. We identify platform-specific cost drivers-plasmids, transfection reagent, and media in transient transfection; media and perfusion consumables in PCL platforms; and affinity capture chromatography in baculovirus processes-with buffer preparation consistently representing the largest downstream material cost across platforms. We further quantify the impact of process development levers: transfection optimization and perfusion-based intensification reduce cost per dose by up to an order of magnitude, whereas affinity resin reuse and capsid enrichment strategies provide modest, incremental savings. Incorporating indication-specific annual viral genome demand reveals how process optimization and scale-up together reduce batch burden and lower dose cost by up to two orders of magnitude, suggesting the potential for improved supply feasibility, even for high-dose neuromuscular indications, under the modeled assumptions of productivity improvement and process optimization. Together, these results provide a quantitative framework linking platform choice, process scale, and unit operations to rAAV manufacturing COGs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.