ArticleScientific reports2026
Parameter estimation of MO-qGEVL distribution under type II progressive censoring with application in environmental data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introducing new distributions is crucial for achieving more accurate fits to real-world data. In this context, many researchers have modified existing distributions by incorporating additional parameters. So a new distribution-called the Marshall-Olkin generalized extreme value distribution under linear normalization-is proposed and its parameters are estimated under type II progressive censoring by maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and Bayesian estimation. However, the MLE of the original GEVL distribution cannot be obtained using classical numerical methods; so, the Whale optimization algorithm is utilized instead. Since humidity plays a vital role in the spread of forest fires, a real data set representing humidity levels in Los Angeles is investigated, showing the superiority of the proposed distribution compared to existing models. Moreover, both distribution fitting (return levels) and time series analysis are employed to forecast future humidity levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.