Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42481559›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Nano Eco-Scale: A scoring system for the assessment of the greenness and safety of manufactured nanomaterials for analytical and environmental applications.

Aya A Abdella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Aya A AbdellaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Elgeish Street, The Medical Campus of Tanta University, Tanta, 31111, Egypt. Aya.atef.86@pharm.tanta.edu.eg.ORCID 0000-0002-6035-6389

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manufactured nanomaterials (MNMs) have transformed analytical and environmental applications by improving efficiency and reducing resource use. However, the "nano-paradox" has raised concerns about the use and development of nanotechnology, complicating regulatory agencies' ability to monitor MNM's environmental impact. In this work, a novel metric tool, the Nano Eco-Scale, is proposed to assess the greenness and environmental safety of nanomaterials used in analytical and environmental applications. The framework is based on the principles of green analytical chemistry and is aligned with REACH regulations for nanomaterials, while incorporating recommendations from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development for standardized characterization and safety evaluation. The tool assigns penalty points to deviations from the ideal nanomaterial across four main domains: synthesis conditions, nanomaterial toxicity, exposure during use, and waste generation and disposal. The overall score is calculated as 100 minus the total penalty points. The Nano Eco-Scale score supports the evaluation and comparison of environmental impacts associated with MNM-based analytical applications such as sensing, environmental monitoring, and water treatment. This approach encourages detailed characterization, highlights potential ecotoxicity risks, and promotes safer-by-design strategies. As a screening tool, it enables rapid comparisons and helps guide the selection of safer and more sustainable options. Additionally, it facilitates systematic data collection that could support future classification approaches. The developed tool supports regulatory efforts and advances the responsible use of nanotechnology in analytical and environmental fields.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringGreen Chemistry TechnologyNanostructuresNanotechnologyEco-scale scoreEco-toxicityGreen analytical chemistryGreennessNanomaterialsNanotoxicity

Identifiers

PMID42481559
PMCPMC13389090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.