Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42481482›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Ammonia at the net-zero crossroads.

Thorin Daniel, Qiong Cai, Lei Xing, Huizhi Wang, Xinli Xu, Lirong Liu, Jin Xuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thorin DanielFaculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Qiong CaiFaculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1677-0515
Lei XingFaculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0360-8025
Huizhi WangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2287-0544
Xinli XuFaculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Lirong LiuFaculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom. lirong.liu@surrey.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2872-0870
Jin XuanFaculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom. j.xuan@surrey.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6718-9018

Funding

Leverhulme Trust PLP-2022-001RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/W018969/2RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/W03722X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ammonia is indispensable for food production and an emerging carbon-free energy vector, yet its synthesis via the fossil-fuelled Haber-Bosch process makes it a major source of carbon dioxide. We introduce the Ammonia Rainbow, a classification framework combining physics-based modelling, learning-curve analysis, and life-cycle sustainability assessment to evaluate net-zero transitions across eight ammonia production technologies. Here we show that, assuming global ammonia demand doubles to meet projected food and energy needs, net-zero ammonia is not achievable by 2050 under any current policy or technological scenario. Even optimistic deployment of green routes demands extensive infrastructure, consuming over 40 percent of available green hydrogen alongside large fractions of carbon capture and renewable energy capacity. Electrochemical routes offer long-term promise but are unlikely to reach commercial viability before 2070 without disruptive innovation. By exposing these hidden systems-level burdens, we challenge the prevailing assumption of unchecked demand growth and argue for demand-side measures, efficiency improvements, and alternative decarbonisation strategies.

Identifiers

PMID42481482
PMCPMC13503741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.