Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42481461›Full record

Trial reportNature communications2026

Domvanalimab plus zimberelimab in unresectable and immunotherapy refractory biliary tract cancers: a phase 2 trial.

David Hsiehchen, John H Lohrey, Radhika Kainthla, Syed Mohammad Ali Kazmi, Nilesh Verma, Carrie Manwaring, Chul Ahn, Hao Zhu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05724563 (Phase II Basket Trial of Domvanalimab), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05724563 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

Phase II Basket Trial of Domvanalimab (AB154) and Zimberelimab (AB122) in Advanced Hepatobiliary Cancers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterRan2023 to 2029Enrolled58ConditionsHepatobiliary Cancer, Liver Cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma, Hepatocellular CarcinomaArmsZimberelimab, Domvanalimab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David HsiehchenDivison of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. David.hsieh@utsouthwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9139-302X
John H LohreyDivison of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Radhika KainthlaDivison of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Syed Mohammad Ali KazmiDivison of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Nilesh VermaDivison of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Carrie ManwaringHarold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Chul AhnHarold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Hao ZhuDivison of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8417-9698

Funding

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas) RP200549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) is an inhibitory receptor that promotes immune evasion, and dual blockade of TIGIT and PD-1 may restore antitumor immunity. Here we report the primary analysis of the biliary tract cancer cohort from a phase 2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05724563) evaluating the Fc-silent anti-TIGIT antibody domvanalimab plus the anti-PD-1 antibody zimberelimab in patients with biliary tract cancers (BTCs) refractory to prior PD-1/L1 therapy. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), safety, 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), and overall survival. Among 29 evaluable patients, the confirmed ORR was 10.3% (95% CI, 2.2-27.4%), with a DCR of 44.8%. The 6-month PFS rate was 17.2% (95% CI, 6.0-35.8%), and the median DoR was 13.6 months. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 36.4% of patients and were primarily limited to low grade pruritus and rash. Emergent circulating tumor DNA alterations in RAS signaling, receptor tyrosine kinases, and DNA damage response were identified as putative mechanisms of anti-TIGIT resistance. Although the prespecified ORR threshold was not met, the durability of responses, favorable safety profile, and translational findings support further evaluation of anti-TIGIT-based combination strategies in BTCs.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiliary Tract NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCombined Antibody TherapeuticsFemaleHumansImmunotherapyMaleMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalReceptors, ImmunologicTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCombined Antibody TherapeuticsReceptors, Immunologic

Identifiers

PMID42481461
PMCPMC13500460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.