Observational studyMuscle & nerve2026
The Anterior Belly of the Digastric Muscle as a Novel Target for Needle Electromyography in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.
Observational study in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsNeedle electromyography (EMG) in the bulbar region aids in the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) but remains technically challenging. The genioglossus muscle (GM) is commonly examined; however, pain and poor relaxation may limit its evaluation. The trapezius is an alternative target but is innervated by the spinal accessory nerve. We investigated the utility of the anterior belly of the digastric muscle (ABDM), innervated by the trigeminal nerve, for bulbar EMG evaluation.
methodsIn this unblinded, prospective observational study, consecutive patients with suspected ALS underwent needle EMG of the ABDM, GM, masseter muscle (MM), and trapezius. Relaxation levels, EMG abnormalities, and pain (100-mm visual analog scale [VAS]) were assessed.
resultsTwenty-seven clinically diagnosed ALS patients were analyzed. Relaxation was better in the ABDM than in the GM (p < 0.001) and comparable to that in the MM and trapezius. Fasciculation potentials were detected more often in the ABDM (52%) than in the GM (0%) and MM (22%; p = 0.039) and were comparable to the trapezius (59%). Chronic denervation occurred at similar frequencies across muscles (33%-59%). The combination of abnormal spontaneous activity and chronic denervation was most frequent in the ABDM (37%). Pain was lower with the ABDM (median VAS score of 21) than with the GM (28; p = 0.0052) and MM (32; p < 0.001) and was similar to the trapezius (23). DISCUSSION: The ABDM may be a practical additional target for bulbar EMG in ALS, with favorable relaxation, lower pain, and potentially improved electrodiagnostic yield.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.