Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42481203›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Comparison of a four-nerve block protocol versus adductor canal block plus local infiltration analgesia for primary total knee arthroplasty in two French private hospitals: protocol for the multicentre randomised INCA trial.

Yoann Elmaleh, Olivier Maupain, Karim Guessous, Fehmi Kattou, Raphael Laurent, Thomas Giral, Thierry Garnier, Bernard Delvaux

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06920186 (Comparison of the Benefit of Peripheral Nerve Quadri-block Versus Adductor Canal Block + Surgical Infiltration in Total Knee Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06920186 narecruitingnot on this map

Comparison of the Benefit of Peripheral Nerve Quadri-block Versus Adductor Canal Block + Surgical Infiltration in Total Knee Arthroplasty

TypeinterventionalSponsorGCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la RechercheRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsGonarthrosis, Total Knee ArthroplastyArmsAnalgesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yoann ElmalehQuincy Anesthésie, Ramsay Santé, Claude Galien Private Hospital, Quincy-sous-Sénart, France y.elmaleh@quincyanesthesie.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7776-4303
Olivier MaupainQuincy Anesthésie, Ramsay Santé, Claude Galien Private Hospital, Quincy-sous-Sénart, France.
Karim GuessousQuincy Anesthésie, Ramsay Santé, Claude Galien Private Hospital, Quincy-sous-Sénart, France.
Fehmi KattouQuincy Anesthésie, Ramsay Santé, Claude Galien Private Hospital, Quincy-sous-Sénart, France.
Raphael LaurentQuincy Anesthésie, Ramsay Santé, Claude Galien Private Hospital, Quincy-sous-Sénart, France.
Thomas GiralQuincy Anesthésie, Ramsay Santé, Claude Galien Private Hospital, Quincy-sous-Sénart, France.
Thierry GarnierQuincy Anesthésie, Ramsay Santé, Claude Galien Private Hospital, Quincy-sous-Sénart, France.
Bernard DelvauxQuincy Anesthésie, Ramsay Santé, Claude Galien Private Hospital, Quincy-sous-Sénart, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundINCA is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, two-arm superiority trial. 100 adult patients scheduled for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) will be randomised 1:1 to one of two locoregional analgesia strategies: group 1 (standard strategy), single-shot adductor canal block (ACB) combined with active surgeon-administered peri-articular infiltration with ropivacaine and participant-facing sham peripheral nerve blocks; group 2 (four-nerve block strategy), single-shot ACB combined with three additional ultrasound-guided nerve blocks (lateral femoral cutaneous, obturator and infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) blocks) plus sham surgical infiltration. All patients will receive general anaesthesia and identical systemic multimodal analgesia (paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), nefopam and rescue opioids) so that any between-group differences can be attributed to the allocated regional strategy. The primary outcome is global recovery at 24 hours, assessed by the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, rescue analgesia including any rescue infiltration, motor function and adverse events, range of motion of the index knee, time to first ambulation, postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, hospital length of stay, QoR-15 at 48 hours and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) at 1 month.

methodsINCA is a multicentre, prospective, randomised two-arm superiority trial. 100 adult patients scheduled for primary TKA will be randomised 1:1 to one of two locoregional analgesia strategies: group 1 (standard strategy), single-shot ACB combined with surgeon-administered peri-articular infiltration; group 2 (four-nerve block strategy), single-shot ACB combined with three additional ultrasound-guided nerve blocks (lateral femoral cutaneous, obturator and IPACK blocks) without active infiltration. Participant-facing sham procedures will be used to preserve blinding. All patients will receive general anaesthesia and identical systemic multimodal analgesia (paracetamol, NSAIDs, nefopam and rescue opioids) so that any between-group differences can be attributed to the regional strategy. The primary outcome is global recovery at 24 hours, assessed by the QoR-15 questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, rescue analgesia including any rescue infiltration, motor function and adverse events, range of motion of the index knee, time to first ambulation, PACU stay, hospital length of stay, QoR-15 at 48 hours and KOOS-JR at 1 month. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the regional ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes). All participants provide written informed consent. The trial will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Study results will be disseminated to participants and submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences to inform best practices in TKA analgesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06920186.Version 4.0 (11 February 2025).

Indexed as

Anesthesia, LocalAnesthetics, LocalArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeNerve BlockPostoperative PainEquivalence Trials as TopicFranceHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPain MeasurementProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRopivacaineUltrasonography, InterventionalAnesthetics, LocalRopivacaineOrthopedicsPain managementPeripheral Nervous System

Identifiers

PMID42481203
PMCPMC13404487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.