Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42481198›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2026

Proof-of-concept randomised controlled trial of data-driven hearing rehabilitation versus standard care in older adults with hearing loss: the healthy hearing for healthy ageing protocol.

Laura Ihalainen, Mariagnese Barbera, Timo Törmäkangas, Petteri Hyvärinen, Tytti Willberg, Pia Linder, Alina Solomon, Aarno Dietz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06495268 (Healthy Hearing for Healthy Ageing), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06495268 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Healthy Hearing for Healthy Ageing: a Proof-of-concept Randomized Controlled Trial of Data-driven Hearing Rehabilitation Versus Standard Care in Older Adults With Hearing Impairment.

TypeinterventionalSponsorKuopio University HospitalRan2024 to 2028Enrolled200ConditionsSensorineural Hearing Loss, Cognitive DeclineArmsIndividualised data-driven hearing rehabilitation, Standard care hearing rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura IhalainenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland laura.ihalainen@pshyvinvointialue.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2420-4457
Mariagnese BarberaInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Timo TörmäkangasGerontology Research Center, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Jyvaskylan Yliopisto, Jyvaskyla, Finland.
Petteri HyvärinenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Tytti WillbergDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Southwest Finland, Finland.
Pia LinderDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Alina SolomonInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Aarno DietzDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHearing aids (HAs) can alleviate hearing loss; however, HA rehabilitation is frequently hampered by delayed diagnosis, suboptimal fitting and lack of systematic follow-up. Although the association between hearing loss and cognitive decline has been identified, evidence from randomised controlled trials remains limited. Addressing these gaps is essential for reducing hearing loss-related experiences and evaluating whether effective HA use could reduce the risk of cognitive decline. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The healthy hearing for healthy ageing study is a proof-of-concept, single-site, two-arm parallel-group 12-month randomised controlled trial with a 12-month extended follow-up. Up to two hundred participants with hearing loss and without cognitive decline referred for an initial HA rehabilitation are recruited and randomised 1:1 to either data-driven hearing rehabilitation or standard care. The primary outcome is the change in two speech perception in noise tests validated for the Finnish language: the Finnish matrix sentence test and the digits-in-noise test. The secondary outcomes are patient-reported outcomes (eg, Hearing in Real-Life Environment and Speech, Spatial and Quality questionnaires), quality of life (eg, 15D-questionnaire), cognitive (eg, Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease test) and psychosocial measures. Exploratory outcomes include event-related responses, cortical auditory evoked potentials, structural brain imaging and vision-related measures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Regional Medical Research Ethics Committee of the well-being Services County of North Savo (approval no. 697/2023). Findings from this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and relevant clinical and patient communities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06495268.

Indexed as

Correction of Hearing ImpairmentHealthy AgingHearing AidsHearing LossAgedFemaleHumansMaleProof of Concept StudyQuality of LifeSpeech PerceptionClinical TrialCognitionHearingREHABILITATION MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID42481198
PMCPMC13404848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.