ArticleBMJ open2026
Nationwide trend analysis of burnout among resident physicians in Japan before and after the national workstyle reform: a repeated cross-sectional survey of 25 368 participants.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study examined temporal changes in burnout and working environments among Japanese resident physicians across the COVID-19 period and the preparation and implementation phases of the national workstyle reform. Furthermore, it assesses associated changes in their working environments.
designThis study was conducted as a multicentre repeated cross-sectional study.
settingData were used from the General Medicine In-Training Examination surveys conducted in 2020, 2022, 2023 and 2024.
participantsParticipants included postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) and PGY-2 residents across Japan. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Data on working hours, emergency duties, inpatient load, self-study time and burnout were collected through standardised questionnaires. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess associations between workstyle reform phases and burnout, adjusting for demographic and institutional characteristics.
resultsAltogether, 25 368 residents participated (6816 in 2020; 6063 in 2022; 6584 in 2023; 5905 in 2024). Burnout prevalence was the highest during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 (21.7%), which decreased to 13.3% in 2024. Weekly working hours of ≥80 hours declined from 19.9% to 2.3%, and those working <45 hours increased from 2.5% to 24.7%. Compared with the pre-reform period (2020-2022), odds of burnout were significantly lower during the preparation (2023; adjusted OR (aOR) 0.60, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.66) and implementation (2024; aOR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.74) phases.
conclusionsResidents' burnout was the highest in 2020 and subsequently declined in parallel with improvements in job satisfaction, working hours and clinical workload. These findings suggest that system-level efforts to improve workload balance may be associated with better resident well-being, while causal attribution to the reform should be interpreted cautiously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.