ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Intensive Care Nurses’ Adherence to Evidence‐Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers and Their Self‐Efficacy: A Cross‐Sectional Study.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nurses' knowledge levels, clinical skills, self-efficacy, and practices play a decisive role in the prevention and management of pressure ulcers. The study aimed to evaluate intensive care nurses in a Turkish university hospital, evidence-based practices and self-efficacy levels in the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers and to determine factors influencing self-efficacy. This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with 134 nurses working in intensive care units of a university hospital. Data were collected using the Pressure Ulcer Management Self-Efficacy Scale and an Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Assessment Form. The mean pressure ulcer self-efficacy score was 57.07 ± 19.28, with the highest in assessment and the lowest in planning. The self-efficacy level was significantly positively correlated with age and the number of patients receiving pressure ulcer care per week. The self-efficacy levels of nurses who had not received training on pressure ulcers and who perceived their knowledge and skills as insufficient were significantly lower. The Braden Scale was widely used, whereas the use of wound assessment scales and modern dressing methods was limited. Nurses' self-efficacy regarding the management of pressure ulcers was above the average level and was affected by age, experience, and education level. Risk assessment was widely practiced, whereas individualised care and advanced treatment methods were insufficient. Regular evidence-based training and hands-on workshops for intensive care nurses may enhance self-efficacy and improve care quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.