ArticleJournal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders2026
Standardizing leave of absence and round-trip protocols for surgical management of pulmonary embolism.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary embolism (PE) remains a significant public health challenge, causing 100,000 to 200,000 deaths annually in the United States. Despite advances in medical technology, mortality rates for high-risk patients with PE remain substantial, highlighting the critical need for standardized interhospital transfer protocols for surgical management. In addition, as hospitals struggle with capacity challenges, other access mechanisms to advanced care for time-sensitive conditions should be explored.
objectiveThis framework aims to develop detailed, evidence-based recommendations for leave of absence and round trip protocols specific to surgical PE management, addressing current gaps in patient transfer and intervention processes.
methodsThrough a detailed analysis of the large academic medical center's workflow, this paper examines current interhospital transfer practices for patients with PE. The methodology involves evaluating patient selection criteria, pretransfer medical optimization, transport logistics, and postprocedure care coordination, using validated risk assessment tools such as the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index score, Bleeding, Age, Cancer, Syncope, echocardiographic evaluations, and the 2026 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology acute PE clinical categories (A-E). This work represents a quality improvement and protocol development analysis; as no primary patient data were collected, Institutional Review Board review was not required. This framework paper does not involve primary patient data collection; sex-disaggregated analysis is therefore not applicable.
conclusionsThe framework offers a systematic approach to improving surgical management of PE through standardized leave of absence and round trip protocols, potentially reducing mortality and improving patient care. The proposed framework includes rigorous patient selection criteria, specialized transfer team composition, thorough pretransfer optimization protocols, and standardized communication and documentation processes. Critical components include careful patient risk stratification, specialized critical care transport teams, and structured postprocedure monitoring and transfer protocols. By establishing a standardized approach to PE patient transfers, this paper aims to provide a construct for timely access to higher-level care to improve clinical outcomes, enhance patient safety, and optimize resource utilization across health care institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.