ArticleGenetics2026
Increased replication-associated single-stranded DNA promotes formaldehyde-induced mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Formaldehyde (FA) is an environmentally abundant and endogenously produced aldehyde that has been shown to cause DNA damage, mutagenesis, and carcinogenesis. Several studies have demonstrated that FA induces guanine mutations resulting in a mutation signature like SBS40. In this work, we use Saccharomyces cerevisiae to demonstrate that replication defects generating single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) caused by the downregulation of the major replicative polymerases results in elevated FA mutagenesis. We found that loss of Mrc1 (CLASPIN) resulted in a high accumulation of ssDNA and FA mutagenesis, and that these phenotypes were not dependent on Mrc1's checkpoint activity. Loss of DNA-protein crosslink repair results in elevated FA sensitivity with no alteration to mutagenesis, likely due to the inability of the fork to bypass unprocessed protein adducts. Finally, we show that FA-induced mutagenesis is dependent on Pol ζ-mediated translesion synthesis, while deficiencies in the template switching pathway do not alter error-free bypass of FA adducts. Overall, our work points towards replication-associated ssDNA as a major substrate for FA-induced damage and elucidates the pathways that function to prevent FA mutagenesis at replication forks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42480506What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.