GuidelineThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults and children.
Guideline in The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Candidemia and invasive candidiasis in children and neonates: transposing adult diagnostic recommendations may undermine end-organ screening.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInvasive candidiasis, including candidemia and deep-seated Candida infections, remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. In Brazil, candidemia is associated with persistently high mortality rates, driven by late diagnosis, limited access to antifungal agents, and heterogeneous diagnostic capacity. The last national guideline issued by the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (SBI) was published in 2013, and substantial advances have occurred since then in epidemiology, diagnostics, and antifungal therapy.
objectivesTo provide an updated, evidence-based Brazilian guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults and children, incorporating contemporary scientific data and addressing the specific epidemiological, diagnostic, and therapeutic realities of Brazil.
methodsThis guideline was developed by the SBI Mycology Committee through a structured consensus process. Clinical questions were formulated using the PICO framework, followed by systematic literature searches of PubMed-indexed studies and international guidelines. Recommendations were contextualized according to Brazilian epidemiology, laboratory infrastructure, and access to antifungal therapies.
resultsKey updates include revised epidemiological data from Brazilian cohorts, updated recommendations for blood culture strategies and non-culture-based diagnostics, refined indications for echocardiography and fundoscopy, and updated therapeutic algorithms. Novel antifungal agents, including long acting echinocandins such as rezafungin, are discussed. Emphasis is placed on early echinocandin therapy, timely source control, antifungal stewardship, and infectious diseases consultation.
conclusionsThis updated Brazilian guideline reflects current scientific evidence while addressing national healthcare realities, aiming to standardize care, improve outcomes, and reduce mortality associated with invasive candidiasis in Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.