ArticleJournal of microbiological methods2026
A pathogenic agnostic water processing method using large-volume dead-end ultrafiltration: A multi-laboratory performance study.
Article in Journal of microbiological methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Treated water systems are critical infrastructures for public health, but can be vulnerable to contamination, whether intentional or accidental. The ability to detect water-transmitted pathogens and biological agents in potable water is critical to effectively respond to and remediate a contamination event or waterborne outbreak. The Protocol for the Recovery and Concentration of Biological Agents in Water samples, or water processing protocol (WPP), was developed for use during such events. The WPP can be used on either 100-L of water concentrated by ultrafilters in the field or unconcentrated 1-L grab samples. The WPP is pathogen agnostic, as is comprised of two workflows that use size selection to capture and concentrate biological agents from parasites down to toxins. A single-laboratory evaluation was conducted by CDC, followed by a multi-laboratory validation (MLV) study with five state public health laboratories. Prior to the MLV, state laboratory participants received in-person training which was followed by training exercises performed in their laboratories. WPP performance was assessed by percent recovery using REXEED-25S ultrafiltered tap water samples seeded with B. anthracis and MS2 coliphage. A bridging study also evaluated different ultrafilter manufacturers for a robust supply chain during an emergency response. The WPP demonstrated ∼50% recovery efficiency for both targets across all filters. During the bridging study, ELISIO-25H performed slightly better for B. anthracis recovery and participants reported a better user experience with ELISIO-25H compared to Xevonta Hi 23 filters. The WPP serves as an essential method for public health readiness to adequately respond to and remediate water system contamination events and waterborne outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.