ArticleBlood advances2026
In vivo and ex vivo impact of THBD and PROCR polymorphisms on the anticoagulant response of the protein C pathway.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is multifactorial, and established hereditary risk factors explain only part of heritable risk. The protein C (PC) pathway is central to anticoagulant control, and common variants in thrombomodulin and endothelial PC receptor genes (THBD, PROCR) have been proposed as modulators. In 73 participants, we used standardized in vivo coagulation activation with recombinant activated factor VII (15 μg/kg) and measured thrombin markers and activated PC (APC) over 8 hours. Endothelial colony-forming cell-based ex vivo experiments were performed in 43 participants. In vivo, the ratio of APC area under the curve (AUC) to thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) AUC, which reflects the endogenous anticoagulant response relative to thrombin generation, provided the best model fit (adjusted R2 = 0.345). The APC response was lower in individuals with previous VTE (median, 0.13 vs 0.26) and PROCR 655A>G carriers (0.11 vs 0.26), but higher in factor V Leiden (FVL) carriers (0.32 vs 0.14) and THBD 1418C>T carriers (0.38 vs 0.13). The THBD 1418C>T effect was driven by reduced TAT AUC (30.6 vs 82.7 pmol × h/L), whereas the PROCR 655A>G effect reflected a lower APC AUC (8.6 vs 10.7 pmol × h/L). Ex vivo, the APC AUC/thrombin AUC ratio was lower with previous VTE and PROCR 655A>G, higher with FVL, and not associated with THBD 1418C>T. No in vivo or ex vivo association was observed for PROCR 4678C>G. This study provides in vivo evidence that common THBD and PROCR variants modulate PC pathway function, establishing the APC response as a sensitive end point for subtle genetic effects beyond FVL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.