Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42480056›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2026

Engagement in cardiac rehabilitation after a first myocardial infarction: a qualitative evidence synthesis of patient experiences.

Ziyuan Niu, Jie Zhao, Zhaoyang Ma, Yanan Sui, Li Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ziyuan NiuSchool of Nursing, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Jie ZhaoSchool of Nursing, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Zhaoyang MaSchool of Nursing, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Yanan SuiSchool of Nursing, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, People's Republic of China.
Li XuJinan Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo synthesize qualitative evidence on factors influencing patients' participation in cardiac rehabilitation after a first acute myocardial infarction.

methodsA search of eight databases was conducted from inception to May 2026. Included studies were quality assessed using JBI criteria, and findings were synthesized using a hybrid approach that combined meta-aggregation for data extraction with thematic synthesis for interpretive analysis.

resultsThe synthesis of 9 qualitative studies yielded 33 synthesized findings. These findings were organized into three key themes: (1) the complex process of identity transformation following a first acute myocardial infarction (2) the dynamic interaction between motivators and barriers affecting participation in cardiac rehabilitation and (3) the fundamental importance of support systems in shaping patient experiences.

conclusionParticipation in cardiac rehabilitation among patients experiencing their first acute myocardial infarction is influenced by multiple factors. To enhance engagement, clinical healthcare providers should address identity disruption, strengthen intrinsic motivation, and facilitate peer and family support through tailored, multidisciplinary, and psychosocially integrated strategies.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationMotivationMyocardial InfarctionPatient ParticipationHumansQualitative ResearchSocial Supportcardiac rehabilitationMyocardial infarctionpatient engagementqualitative researchqualitative synthesis

Identifiers

PMID42480056
PMCPMC13390156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.